Comments on: On the Electromagnetic Basis of Tornadoes. http://collegetimes.us/on-the-electromagnetic-basis-of-tornadoes/ college blog, reviews, forum, tips, and more! Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:17:55 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: jack fitzelle-jones http://collegetimes.us/on-the-electromagnetic-basis-of-tornadoes/#comment-1548 jack fitzelle-jones Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:22:56 +0000 http://collegetimes.us/?p=998#comment-1548 I was excited about Peter Thompsons charged shear vortex theories, but my enthusiasm dimmed when I read links to his other theories concerning UFO's from early civilizations. In strictly logical terms, just because a person ascribes to one crackpot theory, it does not necessarily disprove another theory. But in practical terms, it undermines his credibility. thank you for your excellent article and for providing links. Jack I was excited about Peter Thompsons charged shear vortex theories, but my enthusiasm dimmed when I read links to his other theories concerning UFO’s from early civilizations. In strictly logical terms, just because a person ascribes to one crackpot theory, it does not necessarily disprove another theory. But in practical terms, it undermines his credibility.
thank you for your excellent article and for providing links.
Jack

]]> By: mgmirkin http://collegetimes.us/on-the-electromagnetic-basis-of-tornadoes/#comment-829 mgmirkin Tue, 24 Mar 2009 04:00:40 +0000 http://collegetimes.us/?p=998#comment-829 Agreed. Apologies, probably poor wording on my part. Also realized I somehow forgot a link to the abstract. Will see about amending the post. Happy to make your acquaintance! Regards, ~Michael Gmirkin P.S. A good paper! :o) Have you seen and/or read any of Peter Thompson's work re: charge sheath vortex? Seems to be in a similar vein. http://www.peter-thomson.co.uk/tornado/fusion/Charge_sheath_vortex_basics_for_tornado.html Agreed it's a topic worthy of serious consideration. It seems the current (no pun intended) news article with regard to electromagnetic signals might be a good starting place for further serious investigation. Don't suppose you've tried contacting the researchers for a parlay? Might be fruitful? Y'never know! The right push in the right direction, and all that... Sometimes good things get set in motion. Agreed. Apologies, probably poor wording on my part. Also realized I somehow forgot a link to the abstract. Will see about amending the post.

Happy to make your acquaintance!

Regards,
~Michael Gmirkin

P.S. A good paper! :o ) Have you seen and/or read any of Peter Thompson’s work re: charge sheath vortex? Seems to be in a similar vein.

http://www.peter-thomson.co.uk/tornado/fusion/Charge_sheath_vortex_basics_for_tornado.html

Agreed it’s a topic worthy of serious consideration. It seems the current (no pun intended) news article with regard to electromagnetic signals might be a good starting place for further serious investigation. Don’t suppose you’ve tried contacting the researchers for a parlay? Might be fruitful? Y’never know! The right push in the right direction, and all that… Sometimes good things get set in motion.

]]> By: TD http://collegetimes.us/on-the-electromagnetic-basis-of-tornadoes/#comment-799 TD Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:05:15 +0000 http://collegetimes.us/?p=998#comment-799 "Thomas Dehel, et al, penned an article entitled “Electric Field and Lorentz Force Contribution to Atmospheric Vortex Phenomena” ..." Thanks for mentioning our paper.....I just wanted to point out that it was a peer-reviewed paper, in the Journal of Electrostatics....not just an article. It appears nearly impossible to attract current professional interest in this theory, so it's taking a back seat for now to some other interests, but we do think it's an area that deserves further study. “Thomas Dehel, et al, penned an article entitled “Electric Field and Lorentz Force Contribution to Atmospheric Vortex Phenomena” …”

Thanks for mentioning our paper…..I just wanted to point out that it was a peer-reviewed paper, in the Journal of Electrostatics….not just an article.

It appears nearly impossible to attract current professional interest in this theory, so it’s taking a back seat for now to some other interests, but we do think it’s an area that deserves further study.

]]>